Wednesday, October 21, 2015




Among top 6 beef exporters of India 4 are Hindus???(with Muslim names)

New Delhi, 4 Nov 2014 : News as published...

Muslims are unnecessarily blamed maligned and targeted for excessive meat consumption while the fact is that Christians and Jews are the highest meat consumer communities. The world’s largest beef meat exporter country is Brazil followed by India,Australia, USA and UK.


When we see this matter in an Indian perspective we would be surprised to know that out of six largest meat exporters of India four are Hindus.In spite of these facts Muslims are harassed and targeted and as beef eaters. In several cases they are beaten severely by Hindutva brigades and put behind bars by the police. Many times communal riots took place only due to this blame game. These communal elements become more active during Eid ul Azha festival only to communalize the atmosphere.
But the same Hindutva brigades forget the Hindu animal sacrifice festivals which get media attention world over in which thousands of animals are killed ruthlessly.


There’s a ritual of sacrificing cow which is still performed in many temples of Himachal Pradesh, Surprisingly the high court had to intervene to stop those animal killings in the premises of Mandir specially at the Pashupatinath Temple, Recently in Nepal around a quarter million animals were killed during Gadhimai Hindu rituals festival .


Ironically many Hindu Businessmen are the largest beef suppliers of India.Following are the four largest beef exporters who are Hindus.

1) Al-Kabeer Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Its owner name: Mr. Shatish &Mr. Atul Sabharwal
Add: 92, Jolly makers, Chembur Mumbai 400021.

2) Arabian Exports Pvt.Ltd.
Owner’s name: Mr.Sunil Kapoor
Add: Russian Mansions, Overseas, Mumbai 400001.

3) M.K.R Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Owner’s name Mr. Madan Abott.
Add : MG road, Janpath, New Delhi 110001.

4) P.M.L Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Owner’s name: Mr. A.S Bindra
Add : S.C.O 62-63 Sector -34-A, Chandigarh 160022.


Here is a clear opinion we can form that either they want more profit in exporting beef by stopping poor Dalits, Christians & Muslims or they want these poor people to suffer more in unnecessary legal hurdles, with ultimate motto to suppress minorities and Dalits this propaganda is made by Sanghi and accomplices today they will kill Muslims, then Christians and then poor Dalits, that will not be the end of the manipulation of religious ideology, they further proceed towards internals castes targetting other major Hindus who eat other animals, broadly they are called as Kshatriyas the term includes Rajpoots, Marathas, again several internal classifications among these two communities, it is not the real ideology of so called Hinduism or the real Sanatanidm it only few minds among upper castes off Hindus that we can name as Brahmins other pure(adopted) vegetarians, have started this profession, after few years my nations socio-economic condition will be so worst that no community will lead life happily, if nation is in threat how a single community will be comfortable if you are setting fire to your neighbors house won't it burn yours?

My sincere advice to youth "Avoid those who divide, adapt those who unite", no matter what is his religion, caste, creed, color and ethnicity.









Let us see whether killing of animals and their consumption is permitted in Sanatan(Vedic) Dharma?

It was Gautam Buddha who rejected the authority of Vedas because Vedas sanctions animal slaughter and Hindus of his time did sacrifice animals so he wanted them to stop this practice. Swami Vivekananda is of the same view. He writes,


“In what way do you see this importance of Buddhism in India today?”
“It is obvious and overwhelming. You see India never loses anything; only she takes time to turn everything into bone and muscle. Buddha dealt a blow at animal sacrifice from which India has never recovered; and Buddha said, ‘Kill no cows’, and cow-killing is an impossibility with us.” The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 5 [ Source]


”you read in the Vedas how, when a Sannyasin, a king, or a great man came into a house, the best bullock was killed. How in time it was found that as we were an agricultural race, killing the best bulls meant annihilation of the race. Therefore the practice was stopped, and a voice was raised against the killing of cows. Sometimes we find existing then what we now consider the most horrible customs.”The Complete Works of Swami Vivekandan, Volume 3 [Source ]


Vishnu Smriti 51.64 

When honoring a guest, at a sacrifice, or when worshipping the manes, or the gods, a man may slay cattle, but not otherwise on any account.

Apologist present some verses which are said to prohibit meat consumption but those verses are are often quoted out of context, those verses have historical context, for instance, it’s mentioned in the Vedas


Rig Veda 10.87.16 The fiend [non Aryan, Dasyu, Rakshas, Mleccha] who smears himself with flesh of cattle, with flesh of horses and of human bodies, Who steals the milch-cow’s milk away, O Agni,-tear off the heads of such with fiery fury.



Atharva Veda 1.16.4 If thou [Foreigners] destroy a cow of ours, a human being, or a steed, We pierce thee with this piece of lead so that thou mayst not slay our men.



These verses refer to the foreigners/Non Aryans [Maleccha, Rakshasa] or enemies of deities of Vedic period, that they should not kill the Aryans, or cows or horses OF THE Aryans as Cows and Horses were sources of wealth and horses were also used for warfare, you can have meat of other castes or of foreigners (non Aryans). Who would like their wealth to be destroyed? There may be some confusion among Hindus whether to eat cow or not but there is hardly any prohibition in Vedas to slaughter bull although Vedas do not prohibit any kind of meat.



Some people might say those verses I mentioned above has historical context but they shouldn’t be viewed in a context as all the verses are eternal and it’s applicable for all ages. Then does that mean you should eat dog’s intestines when you are in deep distress? Because the Vedas says,



Rig Veda 4.18.13 In deep distress I cooked a dog’s intestines. Among the Gods I found not one to comfort. My consort I beheld in degradation. The Falcon then brought me the pleasant Soma. ( Hence I advise to read Every Verse of religious books with historical context otherwise you will be misguided).


The reason why its difficult to find verses on meat consumption in the Vedas (from few fundamentalist translators) is because some of the Hindu scholars don’t view the animal sacrifice as literal slaughtering but they view it as charity or symbolic slaughtering. So Hindus should ask their scholars to literally translate the Sanskrit verses on meat consumption, then I am sure all their doubts on meat eating will be cleared. Vedic verses clearly uses words like Maans (Meat), Pachat (Cook) etc,. which is pretty clear for meat consumption but some Hindu scholars like to add their own words into it, they give their own meanings.


Veda clearly speaks of animal killing and putting it in theAgni (Fire) during Yajna, one of the most popular hymn is from the Rig Veda about Horse sacrifice (Ashvamedha Yajna). Ashvamedha mentioned in Rig Veda deals with slaughtering and cooking of the sacrificial horse. I have used English translation of Wilson and Hindi translation of Pundit Ram Govind Trivedi,... Kindly refer them for further reading...


I have referred Hindi translation of Rig Veda 5.29.8 by shri. Pundit Ram Govind Trivedi. Some scholars have skipped the Sanskirt word Maas (Meat/Flesh) in their translation, 

Eg.A great scholar Ram Acharya has translated the verse 5.29.8 as Indra ‘’ACCEPTED’’ the three hundred buffaloes instead of ”Eaten” he has also omitted the word Maas (Flesh/Meat), even if he just accepted the buffaloes then it means later he ate them because Veda commands Indra and Agni to eat the oblation which they receive... Is that clear?


Former Supreme Court judge Justice Markandey Katju called Union Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi an "idiot" over the latter's statement on Thursday that those who cannot live without eating beef should go to Pakistan or any other country.

Slamming the minister – a senior BJP leader – over his remark, Katju posted on his Facebook page: "I am a Hindu, and I have eaten beef, and will again eat it. There is nothing wrong in beef eating. 90% of the world eats beef. Are they all sinners ?"

Friday, October 9, 2015

Workshop on Language and Skills of drafting in Civil cases...

Mr.A.A. Zartargar,
           Senior Advocate, 
           Bagalkot,
Presented his papers in a Workshop @ Al-Ameen College of Law, Bangalore,
           on the topic
 "Language and Skills of Drafting in Civil Cases", 
I feel proud to publish that i was also one of the resources persons to touch the topic on the great day of my life. My special thanks Al-Ammen College of Law.









My salute to great writers and philosophers of the nation...
- Shame on you Hon'ble Mr.PM..
Noted writer Nayantara Sahgal has returned the prestigious Sahitya Akademi Award in protest against what she called the “vanishing space” for diversity.
The niece of the former Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, also said people were being “killed for not agreeing with the ruling ideology.”
Referring to the recent killings of rationalists and writers M.M. Kalburgi, Narendra Dabholkar and Govind Pansare and of Dadri resident Mohammad Akhlaq, who was lynched on suspicion of consuming beef, Ms. Sahgal, speaking to The Hindu from her home in Dehradun, said: “…in this rising tide of hatred, India is being unmade, being destroyed.”
The last straw
Ms. Sahgal said she was concerned at the environment in the country and it seemed to be getting “worse and worse” in the past 15 months. “I guess the death of this poor man in Dadri [Mohammad Akhlaq] was the final…the last straw,” she said.
She criticised the government’s inaction and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s silence. “In all these cases, justice drags its feet. The Prime Minister remains silent on this reign of terror. We must assume he dare not alienate evil-doers who support his ideology,” she said in a written statement.
Denying that her decision stems from her political beliefs, Ms. Sahgal said: “I am not against any political party. India is a democracy, and in democracies every party has a right to be in power, but what we are seeing in India today is fascism. There is a vanishing space for diversity to the extent people are being killed for not agreeing with the ruling ideology.”
Ms. Sahgal was a member of the Sahitya Akademi’s Advisory Board for English but she resigned during the Emergency.
She also famously criticised her cousin, Indira Gandhi, for actions during the Emergency in 1975.
In her written statement, Ms. Sahgal drew attention to a recent speech by Vice-President Hamid Ansari in which he made a reference to the Constitution that promises all Indians “liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.”
“The right to dissent is an integral part of this constitutional guarantee. He found it necessary to do so because India’s culture of diversity and debate is now under vicious assault,” she said.
Here is the full text of her statement as was published on the website indianculturalforum.in
The Unmaking of India
In a recent lecture, India’s Vice-President, Dr. Hamid Ansari, found it necessary to remind us that India’s Constitution promises all Indians “liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.”The right to dissent is an integral part of this Constitutional guarantee. He found it necessary to do so because India’s culture of diversity and debate is now under vicious assault. Rationalists who question superstition, anyone who questions any aspect of the ugly and dangerous distortion of Hinduism known as Hindutva – whether in the intellectual or artistic sphere, or whether in terms of food habits and lifestyle – are being marginalized, persecuted, or murdered. A distinguished Kannada writer and Sahitya Akademi Award winner, M.M. Kalburgi, and two Maharashtrians, Narendra Dhabolkar and Govind Pansare, both anti-superstition activists, have all been killed by gun-toting motor-cyclists. Other dissenters have been warned they are next in line. Most recently, a village blacksmith, Mohammed Akhtaq, was dragged out of his home in Bisara village outside Delhi, and brutally lynched, on the supposed suspicion that beef was cooked in his home.
In all these cases, justice drags its feet. The Prime Minister remains silent about this reign of terror. We must assume he dare not alienate evil-doers who support his ideology. It is a matter of sorrow that the Sahitya Akademi remains silent. The Akademis were set up as guardians of the creative imagination, and promoters of its finest products in art and literature, music and theatre. In protest against Kalburgi’s murder, a Hindi writer, Uday Prakash, has returned his Sahitya Akademi Award. Six Kannada writers have returned their Awards to the Kannada Sahitya Parishat.
In memory of the Indians who have been murdered, in support of all Indians who uphold the right to dissent, and of all dissenters who now live in fear and uncertainty, I am returning my Sahitya Akademi Award.
Signed: Nayantara Sahgal, Dehra Dun, October 6, 2015
A day after writer Nayantara Sahgal returned her Sahitya Akademi award against what she described “unmaking of India, poet Ashok Vajpeyi also handed back the prestigious literary honour to the government, criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up against the recent spree of violence.
Mr. Vajpeyi said that “it’s high time that writers take a stand” to mark their protest against the recent murders of writers and minorities. “We have an eloquent Prime Minister, who addresses lakhs of people, but here writers are being murdered, innocent people are being murdered, his Ministers make controversial statements...Still he is quiet. Why doesn’t he shut them up?” Mr. Vajpeyi told a private news channel.
After seeing Ms. Sahgal, the 88-year-old writer, Mr. Vajpeyi said he decided to give up the award and express his solidarity with her.
"Why doesn't he tell the nation and the writing and creating community that the pluralism of this community will be defended at every cost? Although the government makes announcements that this would not be tolerated, that would not be tolerated ...but tolerance is there. How is it that all this has erupted now?"

Note: data collected from The Hindu...8th October 2015.